prospective-memory
Related Servers
Alternatives to prospective-memory
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for storing and retrieving thoughts, notes, and ideas with semantic vector search, enabling integration with Claude Desktop and other MCP clients.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects AI assistants like Claude to your todo app, enabling natural, friendly reminders and task management without a server to run.81 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA remote MCP server that gives AI assistants a shared memory, enabling structured handoffs, journaling, and notes for seamless continuation across sessions.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA self-hosted personal memory assistant that captures and retrieves thoughts via voice or text, with MCP tools for querying and managing entries.1,117 npmAGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that gives AI assistants long-term memory by storing, searching, and recalling notes as Markdown files on your machine.7 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server enabling AI assistants to store, retrieve, and manage contextual information across conversations with features like persistent memory, advanced search, tagging, and privacy controls.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct lifecycle action (capture, list, search, complete, drop, stats), so agents can generally tell them apart. The only mild overlap is that list_open_tasks and search_tasks can both retrieve open tasks by category, but search_tasks adds text matching to differentiate it.
Five of the six tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern: capture_task, list_open_tasks, search_tasks, complete_task, drop_task. task_stats breaks the pattern by using noun_noun, but this is a single minor deviation in an otherwise consistent set.
Six tools is well-scoped for a prospective-memory/task server. Each tool earns its place and there is no obvious redundancy or bloat.
The set covers the main task lifecycle: capture, list, search, complete, drop, and stats. The notable gap is the lack of an update/edit tool for changing task text or category, plus no explicit reopen flow, but these are workable gaps rather than fatal omissions.