Skip to main content
Glama
Daemon-Killer

prospective-memory

Related Servers

Alternatives to prospective-memory

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for storing and retrieving thoughts, notes, and ideas with semantic vector search, enabling integration with Claude Desktop and other MCP clients.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects AI assistants like Claude to your todo app, enabling natural, friendly reminders and task management without a server to run.
      8
      1 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A remote MCP server that gives AI assistants a shared memory, enabling structured handoffs, journaling, and notes for seamless continuation across sessions.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A self-hosted personal memory assistant that captures and retrieves thoughts via voice or text, with MCP tools for querying and managing entries.
      1,117 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that gives AI assistants long-term memory by storing, searching, and recalling notes as Markdown files on your machine.
      7 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      An MCP server enabling AI assistants to store, retrieve, and manage contextual information across conversations with features like persistent memory, advanced search, tagging, and privacy controls.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct lifecycle action (capture, list, search, complete, drop, stats), so agents can generally tell them apart. The only mild overlap is that list_open_tasks and search_tasks can both retrieve open tasks by category, but search_tasks adds text matching to differentiate it.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Five of the six tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern: capture_task, list_open_tasks, search_tasks, complete_task, drop_task. task_stats breaks the pattern by using noun_noun, but this is a single minor deviation in an otherwise consistent set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a prospective-memory/task server. Each tool earns its place and there is no obvious redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the main task lifecycle: capture, list, search, complete, drop, and stats. The notable gap is the lack of an update/edit tool for changing task text or category, plus no explicit reopen flow, but these are workable gaps rather than fatal omissions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive