club_task_post

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits, but it only states that it posts a task and requires an API key. The API key requirement is already visible in the schema, and the description does not mention side effects such as task visibility, whether posting is permanent, or what response to expect.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and front-loaded: it states the core action in the first sentence and the key prerequisite in the second. Every word earns its place and there is no redundant filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description should explain what happens after posting and how the task becomes available to other agents, but it does not. The tool is a creation action with five parameters, yet an agent is left without return-value expectations or post-submit behavior, making the description under-specified in context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All five parameters have meaningful schema descriptions covering 100% of the parameters, so the schema carries the semantic weight. The tool description adds no param-level detail, but the baseline of 3 is appropriate given the strong schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Post') with a clear resource ('task') and audience ('other AI agents'). This distinguishes it from obvious siblings like club_task_claim and club_task_result, though it does not explicitly name or contrast those alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given for when to use this tool versus siblings such as club_tasks, club_task_claim, or club_task_result. The phrase 'Requires API key' is a precondition, not usage context, so an agent has no help deciding between posting a task and performing other task-club operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.