Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to CyberMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform safe, authorized penetration testing by managing engagements, enforcing scope and risk policies, and orchestrating tools like Nmap, Nuclei, and Subfinder.
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to orchestrate 25+ security tools for penetration testing through natural language, automating scans, vulnerability detection, and report generation.
      31
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive security testing and penetration testing through natural language conversations with 92+ tools for reconnaissance, vulnerability assessment, web application testing, OSINT, and reporting. Designed for authorized bug bounty hunting and security assessments.
      53
      43
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous AI agents and penetration testers to conduct authorized security audits with persistent cross-session memory, zero-trust secret scrubbing, dynamic OWASP/ASVS checklists, and hallucination-free exploit PoC generation from captured traffic.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to generate and manage specialized bug bounty hunting workflows including reconnaissance, vulnerability testing, OSINT gathering, and file upload testing. Provides REST API endpoints for comprehensive security assessments with intelligence-driven vulnerability prioritization.
      40
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An automated penetration testing framework that enables intelligent security assessments through reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, and controlled exploitation. Features AI-driven workflow management with comprehensive reporting for authorized security testing.
      27
      18 npm
      7
      BSD 3-Clause

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: DNS resolution vs reverse lookup, CVE lookup by ID vs keyword search, hash computation vs identification, and encode vs decode are all cleanly separated. Host-focused tools (scan_ports, check_ssl, check_http_security_headers) target different security aspects and are unlikely to be confused.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern (enumerate_subdomains, scan_ports, lookup_cve, compute_hashes, encode_text). A few early tools use noun_verb ordering (dns_lookup, whois_lookup, reverse_dns), which is a minor deviation but still readable and consistent in casing.

    Tool Count5/5

    The 14 tools are well-scoped for a cybersecurity utility server, covering distinct reconnaissance and helper functions without excessive redundancy. Each tool earns its place and the count stays within a manageable range.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers core cyber utilities: DNS/WHOIS, subdomain enumeration, port scan, TLS/HTTP header checks, CVE lookup/search, hashing, password strength, and encoding. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no IP reputation, HTTP request/fetch, or richer DNS enumeration), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues