disable_toolset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. It states the core effect (tools unavailable) but does not disclose any side effects, permissions required, reversibility, or impact on other toolsets. Minimal behavioral context provided.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no fluff. It front-loads the action and immediately explains the consequence. Every sentence is necessary and efficiently written.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter, the description provides the essential information. However, given the lack of annotations, the description could benefit from mentioning prerequisites (e.g., the toolset must exist and be enabled) and any output or confirmation. It is adequate but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers the parameter with a description ('The name of the toolset to disable'), and the tool description does not add additional meaning beyond what is already in the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate since schema coverage is 100%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool disables a toolset that was previously enabled, and explains the consequence (tools no longer available). This distinguishes it from the sibling 'enable_toolset' and is specific about the action and resource.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context (only for previously enabled toolsets) but does not explicitly state when to use or when not to use, nor does it mention alternatives like enable_toolset. Some guidance is present but not thorough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.