A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceThis TypeScript-based server implements a simple notes system, allowing users to create and manage text notes and generate summaries, showcasing core MCP concepts.
12 npm
16
Apache 2.0
MCP-researcher Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP-researcher Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceThis TypeScript-based MCP server implements a simple notes system, allowing the creation, listing, and summarization of text notes using MCP concepts with note:// URIs and metadata.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis TypeScript-based MCP server allows users to manage a simple notes system through creating and summarizing text notes using Model Context Protocol (MCP).1,632 npm8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceThis TypeScript-based MCP server enables users to manage a simple notes system with capabilities to create and summarize notes through structured prompts and resources.1 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis TypeScript-based MCP server enables users to manage and summarize text notes, providing tools for note creation and summarization prompts.3,358 npm10MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that implements a simple notes system, providing resources for accessing notes via URIs, tools for creating notes, and prompts for generating summaries.75 npm-
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 3 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: deep_research for comprehensive analysis, reason for multi-step reasoning tasks, and search for basic queries. The descriptions explicitly differentiate their use cases, eliminating any ambiguity or overlap in functionality.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear, descriptive verbs (deep_research, reason, search). There are no deviations in naming style, making the set predictable and easy to understand.
Tool Count3/5
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a research server, potentially limiting coverage of common research workflows like summarization, citation management, or data extraction. However, the tools are well-scoped to core research tasks, avoiding bloat.
Completeness3/5
The tools cover basic research functions (deep analysis, reasoning, quick search), but there are notable gaps such as no tools for summarizing, filtering results, or handling citations. This may cause agents to work around missing operations in complex research scenarios.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues