Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to infra-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A locally-hosted MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that gives Claude real tools to debug Docker containers — fetch logs, inspect memory/CPU, and run diagnostic commands inside a container, all from a chat with Claude Desktop.
      3
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes live host metrics (CPU, memory, processes, network) to Cursor/Claude via /proc and optional eBPF, enabling system monitoring dashboards and natural language queries.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing Ubuntu servers with AI integration, enabling system monitoring, Docker control, Gitea repository management, Ollama LLM interaction, workspace file operations, and Claude Code assistant via natural language.
      34
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: system monitoring tools target different metrics, and Docker tools separate list/inspect/logs/start/stop/restart. Minor overlap exists between list_containers and compose_status (both list containers but with different grouping) and between container_health and inspect_container (health info is a subset of inspect), but descriptions help differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed: system and GPU tools use noun_noun patterns (system_overview, gpu_status, disk_usage), while Docker tools use verb_noun patterns (list_containers, start_container, restart_container). This inconsistency is mildly confusing, though the pattern is predictable within each subdomain, and all names are readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    21 tools is on the higher end of the optimal range, but each tool covers a specific monitoring or Docker management function that justifies its presence. The count is appropriate for a server that spans both system health and container operations, without feeling bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers system monitoring and Docker container lifecycle well, but has notable gaps: no service management (only status), no Docker container create/remove, no image pull/remove, and no volume/network creation. Basic operations are covered, but full infrastructure management is incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues