Skip to main content
Glama
DMontgomery40

MCP 3D Printer Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP 3D Printer Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to control and monitor Klipper 3D printers via the Moonraker API. It supports comprehensive printer management, including G-code execution, toolchanger operations, and real-time status monitoring.
      25
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage multiple 3D printers via MCP, including monitoring temperatures and progress, uploading and slicing models, controlling prints, and viewing cameras.
      26 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes MCP tools that slice models with headless OrcaSlicer, stage gcode on Moonraker-based Klipper printers, gate job starts behind explicit operator authorization, and report status, telemetry-derived events, snapshots, and alerts. It also manages spools and lets AI agents query job estimates, blockers, and start-precondition checks.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to submit, slice, and start 3D prints with configurable gates, preview approval, and monitoring, via a self-hosted print daemon.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to monitor and control a Bambu Lab P1S printer over the local network, including status, file management, slicing, and print operations.
      11
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 30 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools overlap on the 'start a print' action (upload_gcode with print=true, start_print, process_and_print_stl, print_3mf), and Blender editing/export tools (blender_mcp_call, blender_mcp_edit_model, blender_mcp_export_stl) have adjacent responsibilities. Descriptions do explain the safety gates and distinctions, but the boundary between print entry points requires careful reading.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools use snake_case verb_noun form (get_printer_status, slice_stl, scale_stl, save_template), and the blender_mcp_ and fulu_ families are consistently prefixed. Minor deviations like the noun-only 'fulu_bambu_network_rpc' are the only inconsistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 30 tools this is on the heavy side, spanning STL manipulation, slicing, template management, printer control, and Blender integration. The breadth is real but the surface feels larger than necessary, with multiple print paths that could likely be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is strong: STL inspection/transformation, slicing with templates, printer status/control, safety-gated printing, temperature verification, and Blender round-tripping are all present. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit job-queue or print-history operations), but core lifecycle operations are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow