Skip to main content
Glama
DLHellMe

Telegram MCP Server

by DLHellMe

Related Servers

Alternatives to Telegram MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Telegram, allowing them to search channels, list available channels, retrieve messages, and filter messages by regex patterns.
      51
      42
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only Telegram MCP server that retrieves messages from your DMs, groups, and channels, enabling Claude to generate executive briefings from Telegram conversations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to interact with Telegram channels and groups through API or web scraping for reading posts and searching.
      15
      33
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A bridge allowing Claude Desktop to access Telegram chats and messages via the Model Context Protocol, providing read-only capabilities to retrieve dialogs and messages from Telegram.
      2
      188
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables Claude Code to interact with a personal Telegram account via MTProto, providing over 120 tools for messaging, media, chat management, and more.
      100
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have overlapping purposes that could cause confusion. For example, 'scrape_channel', 'scrape_channel_authenticated', and 'scrape_channel_full' all scrape channels with slight variations in authentication or output format, while 'api_scrape_channel' and 'scrape_channel' seem to do similar things via different methods. The 'get_channel_info' and 'api_get_channel_info' tools also appear redundant, differing mainly in authentication approach.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed but somewhat readable. There are two main patterns: 'api_' prefix for API-based tools (e.g., 'api_get_channel_info') and no prefix for session-based tools (e.g., 'scrape_channel'), but this is inconsistently applied (e.g., 'telegram_api_login' vs. 'telegram_login'). Verbs like 'scrape', 'get', and 'login' are used repeatedly, but the lack of a uniform structure (e.g., mixing prefixes and suffixes) reduces clarity.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 15 tools, the count is borderline high for a Telegram-focused server, but not excessive. The domain involves channel/group scraping and authentication, which could justify multiple tools, but the overlap suggests redundancy rather than necessity. It feels heavy due to the duplication, but the scope is broad enough to warrant a moderate number of tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core Telegram operations well: authentication (login, logout, status), channel/group info retrieval, and scraping with various modes (e.g., date range, manual, full). However, there are minor gaps, such as no tools for sending messages, managing chats, or handling media beyond scraping, which might limit some agent workflows but are not critical for the scraping-focused purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive