Telegram MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Telegram MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Telegram, allowing them to search channels, list available channels, retrieve messages, and filter messages by regex patterns.5142MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA read-only Telegram MCP server that retrieves messages from your DMs, groups, and channels, enabling Claude to generate executive briefings from Telegram conversations.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with Telegram channels and groups through API or web scraping for reading posts and searching.1533MIT
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceA bridge allowing Claude Desktop to access Telegram chats and messages via the Model Context Protocol, providing read-only capabilities to retrieve dialogs and messages from Telegram.2188MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables Claude Code to interact with a personal Telegram account via MTProto, providing over 120 tools for messaging, media, chat management, and more.1002MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that connects Claude to a Telegram personal assistant, enabling message processing, task management, and responses via scheduled workflows.-
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Multiple tools have overlapping purposes that could cause confusion. For example, 'scrape_channel', 'scrape_channel_authenticated', and 'scrape_channel_full' all scrape channels with slight variations in authentication or output format, while 'api_scrape_channel' and 'scrape_channel' seem to do similar things via different methods. The 'get_channel_info' and 'api_get_channel_info' tools also appear redundant, differing mainly in authentication approach.
The naming is mixed but somewhat readable. There are two main patterns: 'api_' prefix for API-based tools (e.g., 'api_get_channel_info') and no prefix for session-based tools (e.g., 'scrape_channel'), but this is inconsistently applied (e.g., 'telegram_api_login' vs. 'telegram_login'). Verbs like 'scrape', 'get', and 'login' are used repeatedly, but the lack of a uniform structure (e.g., mixing prefixes and suffixes) reduces clarity.
With 15 tools, the count is borderline high for a Telegram-focused server, but not excessive. The domain involves channel/group scraping and authentication, which could justify multiple tools, but the overlap suggests redundancy rather than necessity. It feels heavy due to the duplication, but the scope is broad enough to warrant a moderate number of tools.
The tool set covers core Telegram operations well: authentication (login, logout, status), channel/group info retrieval, and scraping with various modes (e.g., date range, manual, full). However, there are minor gaps, such as no tools for sending messages, managing chats, or handling media beyond scraping, which might limit some agent workflows but are not critical for the scraping-focused purpose.