Skip to main content
Glama
DINQ-labs

OpenMailConnect

Official
by DINQ-labs

Related Servers

Alternatives to OpenMailConnect

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to send, read, and manage emails via SMTP and IMAP, with support for attachments, threads, and mailbox organization.
      16
      17 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, compose, and send emails by connecting to any IMAP/SMTP provider. It supports comprehensive mailbox management, including draft handling and message deletion, directly through natural language.
      10
      153 npm
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to email accounts via IMAP/SMTP, enabling reading, searching, sending, and organizing emails with features like smart drafts, scheduling, and attachment handling.
      118 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, send, organize, and search emails across multiple IMAP/SMTP mailboxes.
      1,579 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to read, search, and manage email via IMAP, and send emails with attachments via SMTP, using natural language commands.
      240 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to send, receive, search, and manage emails via SMTP/IMAP, including support for attachments, contacts, and advanced search.
      18
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource/action: connection, accounts, sending, draft creation/listing, search, read, and thread retrieval. There is no meaningful overlap between tools, and the descriptions make the boundaries clear.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools share the mail_ prefix and use consistent snake_case. Action tools use verbs like create_draft, send, search, and read, while resource-listing tools use plural nouns like drafts and accounts, creating a predictable pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for an email integration use case. Each tool earns its place and there is no redundancy or excessive granularity.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows are covered: connect, list accounts, send, read, search, thread, and draft creation/listing. Minor gaps exist around draft lifecycle management, such as updating, deleting, or explicitly sending a draft, but these are not fatal to the primary use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues