OpenMailConnect
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to OpenMailConnect
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to send, read, and manage emails via SMTP and IMAP, with support for attachments, threads, and mailbox organization.1617 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, search, compose, and send emails by connecting to any IMAP/SMTP provider. It supports comprehensive mailbox management, including draft handling and message deletion, directly through natural language.10153 npm10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to email accounts via IMAP/SMTP, enabling reading, searching, sending, and organizing emails with features like smart drafts, scheduling, and attachment handling.118 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, send, organize, and search emails across multiple IMAP/SMTP mailboxes.1,579 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, search, and manage email via IMAP, and send emails with attachments via SMTP, using natural language commands.240 npmMIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI models to send, receive, search, and manage emails via SMTP/IMAP, including support for attachments, contacts, and advanced search.18-
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource/action: connection, accounts, sending, draft creation/listing, search, read, and thread retrieval. There is no meaningful overlap between tools, and the descriptions make the boundaries clear.
All tools share the mail_ prefix and use consistent snake_case. Action tools use verbs like create_draft, send, search, and read, while resource-listing tools use plural nouns like drafts and accounts, creating a predictable pattern.
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for an email integration use case. Each tool earns its place and there is no redundancy or excessive granularity.
Core workflows are covered: connect, list accounts, send, read, search, thread, and draft creation/listing. Minor gaps exist around draft lifecycle management, such as updating, deleting, or explicitly sending a draft, but these are not fatal to the primary use case.