Skip to main content
Glama
DE-BARY-LLC

debary-mcp-compliance

Official
by DE-BARY-LLC
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to debary-mcp-compliance

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • real-estate-ai

      CSOAI-ORG
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered real estate analysis with built-in EU AI Act compliance, providing a production-ready MCP server for property insights and governance.
      1
      MIT

    • projectpermit-mcp

      ChanghuLiu
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables municipal permit preflight checks for construction and renovation projects, returning evidence-linked, rule-version-aware results without using an LLM.
      -

    • LandlordLaw MCP Server

      pearch001
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with instant access to jurisdiction-specific landlord-tenant law data and verified state statutes across five US states and major cities. It enables users to query legal rules for security deposits, eviction timelines, and habitability standards with sub-10ms local response times.
      -

    • MCP Mortgage Server

      confersolutions
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to parse and analyze mortgage documents (Loan Estimates & Closing Disclosures), converting them into structured MISMO-compliant JSON and checking for TRID compliance violations.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool occupies a distinct role: running a compliance check, explaining a rule, suggesting rewrite spans, and retrieving an audit receipt. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern: check_listing, explain_rule, suggest_rewrite, get_receipt. The naming is predictable and makes the action and target of each tool immediately clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a well-scoped size for a compliance-assistance server. Each tool supports a necessary step in the workflow without adding redundant or decorative surface area.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full workflow: check a listing, understand why it was flagged, obtain safe replacement wording, and retrieve verifiable proof of a prior check. The deliberate absence of auto-rewriting is handled cleanly through the check-again instruction.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources