Skip to main content
Glama
DE-BARY-LLC

debary-mcp-compliance

Official
by DE-BARY-LLC

Related Servers

Alternatives to debary-mcp-compliance

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to retrieve verbatim U.S. mortgage regulations with citations and effective dates, verify quotes, and run guided compliance playbooks without sending user documents to the server.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Deterministic compliance audit for cross-border e-commerce listings (Amazon, Temu, TikTok Shop): banned words, promo words, absolute claims, certification and trademark risks, and 2026 AI content disclosure. Versioned YAML rule packs, three-level obfuscation-resistant matching, exit-code CI gate and SARIF output. No LLM involved in judging.
      4
      25 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered real estate analysis with built-in EU AI Act compliance, providing a production-ready MCP server for property insights and governance.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI tools to search, retrieve, and verify verbatim federal mortgage and consumer-finance regulatory text and citations, check currency and version status, and run guided compliance review playbooks within a self-hosted environment.
      Elastic 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic, LLM-free checking of text against a prose editorial standard, returning violations with rule IDs, locations, severity, confidence, and suggested fixes, while also supporting safe fixes and writing measurements.
      5
      14 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool occupies a distinct role: running a compliance check, explaining a rule, suggesting rewrite spans, and retrieving an audit receipt. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow the same snake_case verb_noun pattern: check_listing, explain_rule, suggest_rewrite, get_receipt. The naming is predictable and makes the action and target of each tool immediately clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a well-scoped size for a compliance-assistance server. Each tool supports a necessary step in the workflow without adding redundant or decorative surface area.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers the full workflow: check a listing, understand why it was flagged, obtain safe replacement wording, and retrieve verifiable proof of a prior check. The deliberate absence of auto-rewriting is handled cleanly through the check-again instruction.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues