Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to HeyLead

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      LinkedIn from the user's own logged-in Chrome session for AI agents: search, profiles, post engagers, company employees, lists, sequences, inbox and a Research Pack, with hard caps and a human approval queue. Local-first, no headless browser.
      13
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants like Claude to LinkedIn through your own logged-in browser session, enabling profile and company lookups, messaging, inbox management, job searches, and related actions. All browser interactions run locally on your machine.
      47
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to LinkedIn outreach, enabling lead finding, campaign management, messaging, and analytics through natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables sending LinkedIn messages and invitations, reading conversations, and managing outreach through natural language by automating a real LinkedIn session via a Chrome extension.
      14 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables self-driving LinkedIn prospecting from AI assistants, including finding leads, warming them up, inviting them, and opening conversations, with human approval required before any message is sent.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      LinkedIn prospect intelligence inside Claude. It automates the research behind outreach, not the sending: scrapes posts, profiles and comment threads into a local SQLite database, classifies what a person or company actually posts about, mines comment threads for people already describing your problem, and surfaces uncommon commonalities worth opening with.
      18
      33
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 22 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are cleanly split into read-only resource tools and their mutating counterparts (inbox/answer_inbox, contacts/update_contact, campaign/campaign_status), and descriptions explicitly cross-reference the intended tool. Some overlap remains around replying/sending (answer_inbox vs send_message), reply checking (inbox vs check_replies), and status/reporting (show_status, analytics, campaign_status, suggest_next_action), so an agent could still misselect.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case, with a predictable pattern of resource nouns (contacts, accounts, campaign) paired with action verbs (create_campaign, update_contact, send_message). Minor inconsistencies exist, such as singular/plural pairs (account/accounts, prospect/prospect_view) and noun-only names alongside verb-led names, but nothing chaotic.

    Tool Count3/5

    22 tools is on the heavy side for a single MCP server and reflects a broad product surface; many operations are bundled into action-parameterized mega-tools. It is borderline rather than excessive, but the count increases the chance of overlapping choices.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the main outreach lifecycle: setup, accounts, ICP generation, campaign creation/editing/control, contacts, prospects, scheduler, inbox/replies, messaging, analytics, and meeting booking. Minor gaps remain, such as no direct contact creation/import or explicit campaign listing/calendar-connection tool, but core workflows are represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive