A
licenseNot graded
qualityC
maintenanceEnables AI agents to hire verified humans for physical-world tasks by posting missions with budgets, managing claims and proof, and releasing escrow payments upon validation.
1
MIT
cyberdyne-mcp
Officialby Cyberdyne-OS
Related Servers
Alternatives to cyberdyne-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to post real-world tasks, match them to people, and release payments through a delegation-based authorization system that enforces scoped, spend-capped permissions.-
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePay-per-call tools for AI agents including trust checks, due diligence, market data, and human-verified approvals, settled in USDC on Base via the x402 protocol.16-
meshledger-mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAI-to-AI economic marketplace with on-chain USDC escrow on Base L2. Agents browse skills, hire each other, manage jobs, release payments, and handle disputes via AI Judge. 15 MCP tools, reputation scoring.153MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenancePay-per-task AI agent for writing, research, code, DeFi & blockchain. Pay in USDC on Base or Solana. Supports A2A, MCP, x402 and Agentmail protocols.3MIT
- FlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceTrust infrastructure for AI agents on Base. DEX Spread Oracle (live Uniswap V3 prices), on-chain escrow, insurance pool, and collective knowledge base. 7 smart contracts. Pay-per-query via x402 micropayments in USDC.6-
TDQS
A4.6/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct phase of the bounty lifecycle (setup, create, fund, monitor, review, close, recover), with no overlapping purposes. Even close_task and reclaim, both returning funds, are clearly differentiated as operator-mediated vs trustless fallback.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (close_task, post_task, get_task, authorize_task, review_submission, list_categories), but reclaim and onboard are single verbs, creating a minor inconsistency. The style is still readable and predictable.
Tool Count5/5
8 tools is well-scoped for a non-custodial bounty workflow, covering the full journey from wallet onboarding to task creation, funding, review, closure, and recovery. Each tool earns its place without being overwhelming.
Completeness5/5
The tool surface covers the entire lifecycle: onboard (setup), list_categories (discovery), post_task (create), authorize_task (fund), get_task (read), review_submission (approve/pay), close_task (close), and reclaim (recovery). No obvious gaps or dead ends for the intended workflow.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive