codex-microsoft-todo-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to codex-microsoft-todo-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides todo management tools (add, list, complete, clear, summarize) and a resource for reading all todos, enabling Codex or other MCP clients to organize and track tasks via natural language.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server to read and manage your Microsoft To Do tasks through the Microsoft Graph To Do API.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants like Claude and Cursor to interact with Microsoft To Do via the Microsoft Graph API.25 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA remote MCP server for Microsoft To Do that enables read/write access to tasks, lists, and checklists from ChatGPT or Claude, with multi-account support and Azure deployment.80 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Microsoft To Do that enables managing task lists, tasks, and checklist items via the Microsoft Graph API with zero-config authentication.132Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA simple MCP server that turns a JSON file into a todo list, letting users add, list, complete, delete, and clear tasks through natural language in MCP-compatible clients.-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: task lists vs. tasks, and separate create/update/complete operations. There is no meaningful overlap between the tool purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_task_lists, list_tasks, create_task, update_task, complete_task. The naming clearly indicates both the action and the resource.
With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a focused Microsoft To Do integration. Each tool covers a core operation without unnecessary bloat.
The core workflow of listing, creating, updating, and completing tasks is covered, but there is no delete_task or ability to create/rename task lists. The lack of delete capability is a notable gap in lifecycle management.