Skip to main content
Glama
CupOfOwls

Kroger MCP Server

check_department_exists

Verify department availability in the Kroger system by checking if a specific department ID exists, returning confirmation for inventory or organizational queries.

Instructions

    Check if a department exists in the Kroger system.
    
    Args:
        department_id: The department ID to check
    
    Returns:
        Dictionary indicating whether the department exists
    

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
department_idYes

Implementation Reference

  • The main handler function decorated with @mcp.tool(), which executes the tool logic: checks if the specified department_id exists using the Kroger API client and returns a success/failure response with existence status. The function signature and docstring define the implicit schema.
    @mcp.tool()
    async def check_department_exists(
        department_id: str,
        ctx: Context = None
    ) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """
        Check if a department exists in the Kroger system.
        
        Args:
            department_id: The department ID to check
        
        Returns:
            Dictionary indicating whether the department exists
        """
        if ctx:
            await ctx.info(f"Checking if department '{department_id}' exists")
        
        client = get_client_credentials_client()
        
        try:
            exists = client.location.department_exists(department_id)
            
            return {
                "success": True,
                "department_id": department_id,
                "exists": exists,
                "message": f"Department '{department_id}' {'exists' if exists else 'does not exist'}"
            }
            
        except Exception as e:
            if ctx:
                await ctx.error(f"Error checking department existence: {str(e)}")
            return {
                "success": False,
                "error": str(e)
            }
  • The explicit registration of the info_tools module (containing check_department_exists) onto the MCP server instance.
    info_tools.register_tools(mcp)
  • Shared helper function that provides the client credentials authenticated KrogerAPI client instance, used in the handler for accessing public department data.
    def get_client_credentials_client() -> KrogerAPI:
        """Get or create a client credentials authenticated client for public data"""
        global _client_credentials_client
        
        if _client_credentials_client is not None and _client_credentials_client.test_current_token():
            return _client_credentials_client
        
        _client_credentials_client = None
        
        try:
            load_and_validate_env(["KROGER_CLIENT_ID", "KROGER_CLIENT_SECRET"])
            _client_credentials_client = KrogerAPI()
            
            # Try to load existing token first
            token_file = ".kroger_token_client_product.compact.json"
            token_info = load_token(token_file)
            
            if token_info:
                # Test if the token is still valid
                _client_credentials_client.client.token_info = token_info
                if _client_credentials_client.test_current_token():
                    # Token is valid, use it
                    return _client_credentials_client
            
            # Token is invalid or not found, get a new one
            token_info = _client_credentials_client.authorization.get_token_with_client_credentials("product.compact")
            return _client_credentials_client
        except Exception as e:
            raise Exception(f"Failed to get client credentials: {str(e)}")
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the return type ('Dictionary indicating whether the department exists'), but lacks details on error handling, authentication requirements, rate limits, or what the dictionary contains. For a tool with no annotations, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured and concise, with three clear sections: purpose, arguments, and returns. Each sentence earns its place, and there is no redundant information, making it easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is minimally adequate. It covers the basic purpose and parameter, but lacks details on behavioral aspects like error cases or return structure, which could be important for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaningful context for the single parameter: 'department_id: The department ID to check.' Since schema description coverage is 0% and there is only one parameter, this adequately compensates by explaining the parameter's purpose, though it could specify format or examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Check if a department exists in the Kroger system.' It specifies the verb ('check') and resource ('department'), but does not explicitly differentiate it from sibling tools like 'get_department_details' or 'list_departments', which prevents a score of 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'get_department_details' (for more details) or 'list_departments' (for enumeration). The description only states what it does, not when it is appropriate, leaving the agent to infer usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CupOfOwls/kroger-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server