Skip to main content
Glama
Cubiczan

@cubiczan/chp-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to @cubiczan/chp-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables fail-closed runtime interception of MCP tool calls, blocking denied, verifier-error, or timed-out invocations while forwarding permitted calls with Ed25519 receipts.
      6 npm
      Elastic 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables secure MCP tool execution through a gateway that validates tool metadata, permissions, and integrity, with approval workflows and optional onchain registry verification.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP gateway that applies deterministic, compiled policy to tool discovery, invocation, and outbound data flow, with no model in the enforcement path. Every decision emits a hash-chained receipt sealed with Ed25519 and verifiable using public keys only.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a governed execution boundary for AI agents, enforcing deterministic policy, one-shot human approvals, and signed receipts for MCP tool effects.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enforces deterministic security policies as an inline firewall for MCP server tool calls, with AST-based validation, cryptographic audit logging, and CLI-based evaluation and verification.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Policy sidecar for any MCP server: deny-by-default tool allowlist with argument rules, call and USD budget caps, and a hash-chained audit log with RFC 3161 timestamps.
      9
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The authorization lifecycle is split across several tools with fuzzy boundaries: evaluate_spend_gate and evaluate_tool_approval both evaluate proposed actions, while approve_spend, issue_approval_receipt, and request_authorization can all produce signed receipts. Detailed descriptions help, but an agent selecting by name alone will struggle to identify the correct phase.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear lowercase verb_noun pattern such as evaluate_spend_gate, place_equity_order, inspect_audit_ledger, and authorize_tool_call. The only deviations are the two chp_* utility tools, chp_content_hash and chp_version, which are consistently prefixed but not verb-led.

    Tool Count4/5

    Twelve tools is within the ideal range for a policy/authorization MCP and the count is not bloated. However, there is some redundancy in the approval and receipt-issuance tools, so a couple of tools could be consolidated without losing functionality.

    Completeness4/5

    The core flow is covered end-to-end: evaluate policy, request/approve authorization, issue and verify receipts, execute scoped reference tools, and inspect the audit ledger. Missing pieces are mostly non-critical, such as explicit receipt revocation or allowlist management, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues