Skip to main content
Glama
CryptoAPIs-io

@cryptoapis-io/mcp-aml

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to @cryptoapis-io/mcp-aml

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for AML/KYT crypto wallet screening, enabling AI clients to check wallet risk scores, source-of-funds tags, activity dates, and volume totals via Satoshkin backend.
      1
      87 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for anti-money laundering (AML) compliance, including customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and SAR filing, compliant with 6AMLD, UK MLR 2017, and FinCEN.
      4
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Crypto APIs Utils, enabling address validation, raw transaction decoding, and XRP X-Address encoding/decoding for UTXO, EVM, and XRP blockchains.
      5
      369 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Infinihash KYT providing real-time blockchain transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and SAR generation. It enables MCP-compatible agents to screen wallets against OFAC SDN and generate compliance cases.
      10
      18 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables blockchain AML screening of addresses in plain language inside any MCP client, covering sanctions and freeze checks, risk scoring, fund tracing, and counterparty classification across bitcoin, ethereum, bsc, and tron. Works without an account, with an optional API key that lifts rate limits and unlocks outgoing tracing.
      3
      52 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are completely distinct: one performs AML checks on addresses/transactions, the other provides system documentation. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Tool names 'aml' and 'system_info' follow no consistent pattern, mixing an acronym with snake_case. The action names inside 'aml' use hyphenation, further breaking any unified naming convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin, especially since one tool is documentation-only. However, the core AML operations are bundled into a single tool, making it a borderline case.

    Completeness4/5

    The AML tool covers the essential functions for its purpose: verifying addresses and screening transactions. Minor gaps like batch processing or detailed report retrieval exist, but they are not critical for the primary use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues