Get Search Urls Events Samples

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It implies a read/sampling operation but says nothing about permissions, rate limits, whether results are truncated, or how 'samples' are selected. Only the events concept adds behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single efficient sentence with the key concept front-loaded and no filler. It is arguably too terse given the tool's complexity, but there is no wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and all parameters are documented, so return values and inputs are covered elsewhere. However, with no annotations and no usage guidance, the description leaves the agent without routing or safety context for a tool with three similar siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and all four parameters (limit, offset, host_id, user_id) are documented in the schema. The description adds no additional parameter meaning, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb (Get) and resource (samples of pages that recently appeared or disappeared from Yandex search), clarifying that 'events' means appearance/disappearance. It is clear on its own but never distinguishes itself from near-identical siblings like get_search_urls_samples or get_search_urls_events_history.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or named alternative, despite several overlapping siblings (get_search_urls_samples, get_search_urls_events_history). The reader must infer the scenario from 'recently appeared or disappeared' alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.