Skip to main content
Glama
Zero Wire MCP

Zero Wire MCP

by Craael

Related Servers

Alternatives to Zero Wire MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only, source-backed vulnerability investigations, recent intelligence discovery, CVE/package evidence review, and observed-change timelines through cached MCP tools covering briefings, CISA KEV, EPSS, GitHub advisories, and OSV records.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP client to look up CVE intelligence — severity summaries, filtered searches, and full per-CVE detail fusing NVD, MITRE-CNA pre-NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS, and GitHub GHSA data — alongside a Shodan-derived internet-exposure footprint showing how many internet-facing services run a version mapping to a given CVE. It is free, keyless, and read-only, and distinguishes verified zeros from unassessed or failed lookups.
      16
      3,907 npm
      21
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects MCP clients to a public CVE activity feed and private product watches, letting agents search advisories, save watched products, check and acknowledge matches, and track new or updated vulnerability records.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to look up data breaches and leaked passwords, search NVD CVEs and the CISA KEV catalogue, and generate passive attack-surface reports for a domain covering security headers, TLS, email/DNS security, and CT-log subdomains. All checks are read-only and passive, using only public third-party data sources.
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables querying vulnerability data such as vendors, products, product-related CVEs, specific CVE IDs, recent CVEs with CAPEC/CWE/CPE expansions, and current database update information.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: enumerate the feed (list_vulnerabilities), retrieve one briefing (get_vulnerability), filter (search_vulnerabilities), and fetch a specific attached artifact (get_assessment_prompt). The only mild overlap is between list and search, which is resolved by search requiring at least one filter and list returning everything unfiltered.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_/get_/search_ + resource). The resource naming is consistent (vulnerabilities, vulnerability, assessment_prompt), with the singular/plural distinction correctly tracking whether one or many items are returned.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is lean but appropriate for a read-only curated briefing feed; list/get/search/prompt covers the full interaction model without redundancy. It sits at the low end, though adding a metadata/tag discovery tool would not feel excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-only surface is essentially complete for this domain: enumeration, single-record retrieval, filtered search, and access to the associated assessment prompt. Minor gaps exist around discovering available tags/statuses/date ranges for search, which an agent can only learn by trial.

    Maintenance

    ActivityNo data
    ResponsivenessOutdated data