distributions_get_versions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the required license and the exact endpoint (POST /public_api/v1/distributions/get_versions), adding behavioral context. However, it does not explicitly state whether the operation is read-only or describe the response format, leaving some behavioral traits undisclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: a two-sentence title and detail, with the endpoint and license inline. No redundant words or over-specification. The structure front-loads the purpose and adds supporting details efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema tool, the description covers the core purpose, license requirements, and endpoint. It stops short of declaring read-only behavior and return structure, but given the tool's simplicity, the provided context is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero defined parameters (with additionalProperties true), so the baseline per rules is 4. The description correctly avoids inventing parameter details, and the empty schema leaves nothing to explain. The additionalProperties true is not addressed, but with 0 params this is a minor gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get Distribution version' and expands to 'Get a list of all the agent versions to use for creating a distribution list,' specifying both the verb and the resource. It distinguishes from sibling distribution tools like distributions_create, distributions_delete, distributions_get_status, and distributions_get_dist_url.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides usage context by saying 'to use for creating a distribution list' and lists required license levels, indicating when this tool is appropriate. It does not explicitly mention alternatives or exclusions, but the context is clear enough for an agent to infer usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.