Bisibility
Related Servers
Alternatives to Bisibility
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceStandalone MCP server for the Mangools API with 82 tools covering keyword research, SERP analysis, rank tracking, backlinks, competitor research, and AI search visibility. Enables natural language interaction with Mangools SEO capabilities.82-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server & CLI for keyword research, domain analytics, backlinks, traffic analysis, and competitive intelligence using Semrush API data.7744 npm39MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that integrates with the Haloscan SEO API to provide tools for keyword research, SERP analysis, and domain performance tracking. It enables users to perform comprehensive SEO tasks, including competitor analysis and visibility monitoring, within MCP-compatible clients.3397 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hostable SEO data MCP server: keyword metrics, Google and Bing SERP, competitors, keyword gap, Google Maps businesses and a Local Market Check package via DataForSEO, paid per call with x402 (USDC on Base). Free tools list services, validate input and give daily free samples.371MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA standalone MCP server for Ubersuggest that runs entirely locally using SQLite and Playwright, providing tools to query subscription status, projects, domain overview, keyword research, site audit, and more.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn agent-friendly MCP server for the GeoRanker High-Volume API, enabling SEO rank tracking and keyword management through natural language.15 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 140 tools
Many tools, especially the AI tracking block, share identical boilerplate descriptions (e.g., list_ai_tracking_schedules/topics/prompts/runs/samples all say 'Read project-scoped AI tracking evidence...', while create/update/archive variants all say 'Manage project-scoped AI tracking...'), forcing agents to rely on names alone. Overlaps also appear among provider settings (update_provider_settings vs set_provider_enabled/set_provider_priority vs deprecated set_primary_provider) and saved views/keywords.
Tool names are predominantly consistent snake_case verb_noun (list_keywords, create_project, update_webhook, delete_saved_view). A few deviations exist, such as ai_tracking_suggestions_preview/generate (noun-first) and mixed singular/plural resource forms (delete_keyword vs add_keywords), but the pattern remains predictable overall.
With 140 tools, the surface far exceeds the typical 3–15 well-scoped range and crosses the 50+ extreme threshold. Even for a broad SEO/AI visibility platform, this volume overwhelms an agent and makes coherent selection difficult.
The surface covers a wide lifecycle: projects, keywords, rank checks, backlinks, domain overview, AI tracking, site audits, alerts, webhooks, team, tokens, providers, signals, and traffic. Minor gaps remain (e.g., no update/get for saved views or saved keywords, no get_competitor or get_alert_rule), but agents can work around them via list operations.