Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to PMCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server gateway that reduces context bloat through progressive tool discovery and Lua-based tool chaining, while centralizing multiple MCP servers into a single endpoint.
      15
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A multiplexing gateway that aggregates multiple MCP servers into a single port, significantly reducing context token usage through a Meta-MCP discovery system. It enables dynamic tool discovery and invocation across various transport protocols including stdio, HTTP, and SSE.
      15
      75
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A gateway that aggregates multiple MCP servers into a single endpoint, namespacing their tools and forwarding calls, so an agent connects to one MCP to access the entire stack.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A progressive-disclosure gateway for MCP servers that keeps tool lists small by exposing one top-level tool per server, allowing agents to search, list, inspect, and call underlying tools within a selected domain.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A discovery and routing layer for MCP servers that loads tool definitions on demand, reducing token usage by keeping servers out of the context window until needed.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables connecting multiple downstream MCP servers into a single gateway, with unified tool search, namespacing, and deferred loading to preserve context window.
      2
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with descriptive names and detailed descriptions. Ambiguities like gateway.cancel vs gateway.tasks_cancel are explicitly resolved in the descriptions, so agents can reliably differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent `gateway.` prefix with lowercase snake_case verbs and nouns (e.g., list_pending, config_status, search_registry). The naming pattern is uniform and predictable across the entire set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 26 tools, the count exceeds the recommended upper bound of 25 for a cohesive toolset. While the gateway domain is broad, several tools could be consolidated (e.g., merging status/check tools) to reduce cognitive overhead.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core lifecycle operations: discovery, provisioning, invocation, task management, config, health, and feedback. Minor gaps exist (no explicit uninstall/remove server tool), but the common workflows are well-supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive