Skip to main content
Glama
Consiliency

pangram-mcp

by Consiliency
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to pangram-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • grammar-coach

      Najeeb-AI-bots
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI hosts to check text for grammar, spelling, and style errors, measure readability, and generate tone-adjusted rewrites through structured tool calls. Every tool returns predictable, typed output for reliable routing and results.
      MIT

    • GPTZero MCP Server

      louis030195
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-generated text detection using the GPTZero API. Provides confidence scores and detailed analysis to identify whether text was written by humans or AI, with multilingual support.
      2
      10 npm
      2
      MIT

    • avoid-ai-writing-mcp

      conorbronsdon
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides local, deterministic scoring and detailed auditing of text for AI-writing patterns via two read-only tools, with no network calls or language models.
      2
      15 npm
      3
      MIT

    • Rubiscout Email Analysis MCP

      raj-rubicon
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Analyzes raw email headers and emails for phishing, spoofing, and BEC using AI forensics, SPF/DKIM/DMARC/ARC validation, and IP reputation checks. Exposes analyze_email, get_analysis, and list_analyses as MCP tools.
      3
      7 npm
      MIT

    • AI Content Detector

      BACH-AI-Tools
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables detection of AI-generated content from ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Gemini models through the BACH AI Content Detector API.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only a single tool, there is no possibility of overlap or misselection. The tool's purpose (AI-text detection) is unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A lone tool named 'analyze' follows a clear verb-style convention and is readable. With one tool there is no convention to violate.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server wraps a single-purpose detection API, so one tool is defensible, but it feels thin for anything beyond a one-shot call. There is no batch, async, or configuration surface.

    Completeness4/5

    The core detection operation is fully covered, returning verdicts, class fractions, and per-segment windows. Minor gaps exist for batch/multi-document analysis or history retrieval, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources