Skip to main content
Glama
Complexity-ML

Complexity Source MCP

Official
by Complexity-ML
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Complexity Source MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • provgraf-mcp

      Inarus
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server exposing a W3C PROV knowledge graph of verified facts with provenance, enabling AI agents to list, search, and check facts while enforcing that writes remain CLI-only.
      5
      MIT

    • Sourceplane MCP

      infraWS
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Secure multi-source MCP server for reading local, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and network source code with read-only-by-default access, enabling AI assistants to inspect repositories safely.
      1
      MIT

    • MCQuest MCP

      LionTechSupport
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that gives AI coding agents structured access to a project's source code, architecture, documentation, and Git context through 16 tools for searching, reading, and comparing evidence without modifying files.
      16
      -

    • MCP Knowledge Assistant

      channico
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that enables AI clients to search a knowledge base and retrieve complete source documents via narrow search and fetch tools.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool serves a clearly distinct purpose. Source tools are separated by source type (web, GitHub, local, image, policy), and fantasy tools are distinct in their operations (search, get, trace, status). No overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (read_*, search_*, list_*, get_*, trace_*, *status). The naming is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    Ten tools is an appropriate number for a server covering two well-defined domains (source reading and fantasy catalog). Each tool earns its place without being excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is complete for its intended read-only scope. Source reading covers all major source types with policy listing, and the fantasy catalog covers search, retrieval, relation tracing, and status. No obvious gaps given the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources