Skip to main content
Glama

Add a medication

add_medication

Add a medication record to your health ledger, including dose, frequency, schedule, and refill due date for tracking medication adherence.

Instructions

Store a structured medication with schedule/refill metadata.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
doseNo
nameYes
userNo
notesNo
routeNo
statusNoactive
end_dateNo
scheduleNo
frequencyNo
indicationNo
prescriberNo
start_dateNo
generic_nameNo
instructionsNo
refill_due_dateNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and idempotentHint=false. The description adds 'with schedule/refill metadata' but does not disclose whether duplicates are allowed, if it updates existing records, or any side effects. It adds some behavioral context but is incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single 9-word sentence, concise and front-loaded with no extraneous content. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of 15 parameters and the existence of an output schema, the description is highly incomplete. It does not explain return values, parameter usage, or provide examples, leaving agents underinformed for a write operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage and 15 parameters, the description provides no parameter-specific information. 'Schedule/refill metadata' vaguely hints at some parameters but fails to explain any, leaving agents without necessary detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Store a structured medication with schedule/refill metadata' clearly indicates the action (store) and resource (medication) with specific metadata. It distinguishes from siblings like add_allergy or log_medication_taken by focusing on medication storage, though it doesn't explicitly state 'create'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like log_medication_taken or list_medications. The description lacks any context about prerequisites, conditions, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Cole-Will-I-Am/HealthLedger-MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server