CodePeel MCP Serverofficial
A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI agents to review code diffs for bugs, security issues, and bad patterns, and generate fixes.
4
MIT
Fang
Related Servers
Alternatives to Fang
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI coding agents to obtain clean failing-test context, ranked suspect lines, runtime value comparisons, bounded code search, and patch verification so they can fix Python test failures with fewer tokens.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a code-quality backend MCP tool that automatically writes and repairs pytest tests, runs them in a sandbox, validates their effectiveness via mutation testing, and surfaces suspected source bugs for human review.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables coding agents to select bounded Python source context, run configured checks, and retrieve compact failure reports, diagnostic comparisons, and freshness evidence tied to the checked code.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables delegating coding tasks to sandboxed agents, returning changes as auditable diffs for human review before applying or discarding them.1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides deterministic Python code quality analysis using flake8, mypy, McCabe, and vulture, enabling LLMs to access real linting and type checking results.1-
TDQS
B3.2/5.0
Scored across 4 tools
Disambiguation3/5
fang_check_diff and fang_list_survivors both run analysis and return surviving/failed-to-detect mutants, making their boundary somewhat unclear despite differing detail/pagination emphasis. fang_mutation_score and fang_doctor are clearly distinct, but the core two tools overlap enough to risk misselection.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools use the fang_ prefix and snake_case, which is consistent and readable. The verb/noun pattern is mostly followed (check_diff, list_survivors), though mutation_score and doctor are minor deviations.
Tool Count4/5
Four tools is a reasonable, focused scope for a mutation-testing server. The set is neither bloated nor extremely thin, though the check_diff/list_survivors overlap slightly weakens the case for each tool earning a fully distinct place.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers diff-scoped mutation checks, mutation scores for diff or whole project, survivor listing, and project inspection. Minor gaps exist around whole-project detailed mutant reporting or configuration, but core mutation-testing workflows are covered.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues