Graduation + Momentum (bezahlt, x402)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description mentions 'Bezahlt (USDC via x402)' suggesting a paid operation, but it does not elaborate on cost, authentication, rate limits, or any side effects. The tool's behavior beyond the returned summary is completely opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, consisting of two sentences. The first sentence 'Bezahlt (USDC via x402)' is cryptic and not explained, reducing clarity despite conciseness. The second sentence is clear but the structure is front-loaded with unclear information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description should provide comprehensive context. It mentions the output covers graduation progress and momentum, but does not specify the format, example values, or any additional details about the token. Given the tool appears to be paid, crucial usage context is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter (token) with 0% description coverage. The description mentions 'einen nad.fun-Token' which implies the token must be from nad.fun, but it does not explicitly describe the parameter or its format. The schema's regex pattern is not reinforced or explained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool provides graduation progress (bonding curve percentage) and momentum summary for a nad.fun token. The verb is implied but clear from context. The phrase 'Guenstiger Einstieg' adds usage context. However, the title includes 'bezahlt' and 'x402' which are not explained in the description, slightly reducing clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus sibling tools (decide_token, score_token, etc.). The description does not mention prerequisites, alternatives, or exclusion criteria. The term 'Guenstiger Einstieg' hints at a use case (cheaper entry), but it is not explicit about when to prefer this tool over others.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.