No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct roles, but some boundaries require careful reading: swg_release vs swg_withdraw, swg_reacquire vs swg_read, and swg_write vs swg_write_cas all touch overlapping recovery/hold concepts. The descriptions do disambiguate them, so misselection is limited but plausible under time pressure.
All tools share the same swg_ prefix and lowercase snake_case convention, with predictable verb-based names such as swg_read, swg_write, swg_release, swg_transfer, swg_accept, and swg_decline. The noun-style swg_status and compound swg_write_cas are still consistent with the overall pattern.
Eleven tools is well within a reasonable range for a stateful filesystem coherence protocol with write tracking and handoff semantics. Each tool covers a distinct lifecycle step: status, read, write, CAS write, recover, release, gate, transfer, accept, decline, and withdraw.
The core guard lifecycle is well covered: read, write, CAS, recovery, release, pre-action gate, and the full handoff lifecycle. Minor gaps remain for general workspace file operations such as delete, rename, or list, but these may be intentionally outside the guard-focused scope.