Search Stock News MCP Server
🔌 Cline、Cursor、Claude Desktop、その他の MCP クライアントと互換性があります。
Search Stock News MCPは、あらゆるMCPクライアントとシームレスに連携します。
モデル コンテキスト プロトコル (MCP) は、AI システムがさまざまなデータ ソースやツールとシームレスに対話し、安全な双方向接続を実現できるようにするオープン スタンダードです。
Search Stock News MCP サーバーは以下を提供します。
Tavily API によるリアルタイムの株価ニュース検索機能
複数のカスタマイズ可能な検索クエリテンプレート
設定可能な検索パラメータとフィルタリング
ドメイン固有のコンテンツフィルタリング
TypeScriptによる型安全な操作
前提条件🔧
始める前に、次のものを用意してください。
Tavily APIキー
Claude Desktop、Cursor、またはMCP互換クライアント
Node.js (v16 以上)
Git がインストールされている (Git インストール方法を使用する場合のみ必要)
Related MCP server: Tavily News Search MCP Server
株価ニュース検索MCPサーバーのインストール⚡
NPXで実行
npx -y search-stock-news-mcp@latestSmithery経由でインストール
Smithery 経由で Claude Desktop 用の Search Stock News MCP Server を自動的にインストールするには:
npx -y @smithery/cli install search-stock-news-mcp --client claudeMCP クライアントの設定 ⚙️
Cline の設定 🤖
Cline で Search Stock News MCP サーバーをセットアップする最も簡単な方法は、マーケットプレイスを使用することです。
VS CodeでClineを開く
サイドバーのClineアイコンをクリックします
「MCPサーバー」タブに移動します
「Search Stock News」を検索し、「インストール」をクリック
プロンプトが表示されたら、Tavily APIキーを入力してください。
あるいは、Cline でサーバーを手動で構成します。
Cline MCP 設定ファイルを開きます。
# For macOS:
code ~/Library/Application\ Support/Code/User/globalStorage/saoudrizwan.claude-dev/settings/cline_mcp_settings.json
# For Windows:
code %APPDATA%\Code\User\globalStorage\saoudrizwan.claude-dev\settings\cline_mcp_settings.jsonSearch Stock News サーバー構成を追加します。
{
"mcpServers": {
"search-stock-news-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "search-stock-news-mcp@latest"],
"env": {
"TAVILY_API_KEY": "your-api-key-here"
},
"disabled": false,
"autoApprove": []
}
}
}カーソルの設定 🖥️
Cursor で Search Stock News MCP サーバーを設定するには:
カーソル設定を開く
機能 > MCP サーバーに移動します
「+新しいMCPサーバーを追加」ボタンをクリックします。
以下の情報を入力してください。
名前:「search-stock-news-mcp」
タイプ:「コマンド」
コマンド: GXP5
Claude デスクトップの設定 🖥️
macOSの場合:
touch "$HOME/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json"
open -e "$HOME/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json"Windowsの場合:
code %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.jsonサーバー構成を追加します。
{
"mcpServers": {
"search-stock-news-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "search-stock-news-mcp@latest"],
"env": {
"TAVILY_API_KEY": "your-api-key-here"
}
}
}
}使用例 🎯
基本的な株式ニュース検索:
{
"symbol": "AAPL",
"companyName": "Apple Inc.",
"maxResults": 10
}フィルターを使った高度な検索:
{
"symbol": "TSLA",
"companyName": "Tesla Inc.",
"maxResults": 20,
"searchDepth": "advanced",
"minScore": 0.6
}カスタムドメイン検索:
{
"symbol": "MSFT",
"companyName": "Microsoft Corporation",
"includeDomains": ["reuters.com", "bloomberg.com"]
}トラブルシューティング 🛠️
よくある問題
サーバーが見つかりません
npmのインストールを確認する
設定構文を確認する
Node.jsが正しくインストールされていることを確認する
APIキーの問題
Tavily APIキーが有効であることを確認してください
APIキーが設定で正しく設定されていることを確認してください
APIキーの前後にスペースや引用符がないことを確認してください
検索結果の問題
検索パラメータが有効な範囲内であることを確認してください
ドメインフィルターが正しくフォーマットされていることを確認する
会社名とシンボルが正確であることを確認する
謝辞✨
MCP仕様のモデルコンテキストプロトコル
クロード・デスクトップのAnthropic
ニュース検索APIのTavily
ライセンス
マサチューセッツ工科大学
Available Tools
2 toolsgeneral-searchC
Perform a general web search using Tavily API
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| maxResults | No | Maximum number of results to return | |
| minScore | No | Minimum relevance score threshold | |
| query | Yes | Search query | |
| searchDepth | No | Search depth level |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. While 'Perform a general web search' implies a read-only operation, it doesn't address important behavioral aspects like rate limits, authentication requirements, error handling, or what constitutes a 'general' versus specialized search. The mention of Tavily API is helpful but insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise - a single sentence that communicates the core purpose efficiently. There's no wasted language or unnecessary elaboration, making it easy to parse quickly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a search tool with 4 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is inadequate. It doesn't explain what results look like, how relevance scoring works, what the searchDepth levels mean, or provide any context about the Tavily API's capabilities or limitations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds no parameter-specific information beyond what's already in the schema (which has 100% coverage). It doesn't explain what 'general web search' means in relation to the parameters like searchDepth levels or score thresholds. The baseline of 3 is appropriate since the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Perform a general web search') and specifies the resource/API used ('using Tavily API'), which distinguishes it from generic search tools. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from its sibling 'search-stock-news', which appears to be a more specialized search tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of its sibling tool 'search-stock-news' or any other search tools, nor does it indicate appropriate contexts or exclusions for using this general web search.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
search-stock-newsC
Search for stock-related news using Tavily API
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| companyName | Yes | Company name (e.g., Apple Inc.) | |
| maxResults | No | Maximum number of results to return | |
| minScore | No | Minimum relevance score threshold | |
| searchDepth | No | Search depth level | |
| symbol | Yes | Stock symbol (e.g., AAPL) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions the Tavily API but doesn't describe key behaviors such as rate limits, authentication needs, error handling, or what the search results include (e.g., headlines, summaries, sources). For a search tool with external API dependencies, this is a significant gap.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste. It's front-loaded with the core purpose and includes the API name for context. Every word earns its place, making it highly concise and well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of a search tool with 5 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what the tool returns (e.g., list of articles with fields), how results are ordered, or any behavioral traits like pagination or API constraints. For a tool with rich input schema but missing output and behavioral context, it should do more.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 5 parameters thoroughly. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what's in the schema (e.g., no examples of how parameters interact or typical values). Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb ('Search') and resource ('stock-related news'), and specifies the API used ('Tavily API'). It distinguishes from the sibling 'general-search' by focusing on stock-related content, though it doesn't explicitly mention this differentiation. The purpose is specific and actionable.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'general-search', nor does it mention any prerequisites, exclusions, or contextual triggers. It simply states what the tool does without indicating appropriate scenarios or limitations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
v1.0.0- First observed
general-search - First observed
search-stock-news
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: 'general-search' is for broad web searches, while 'search-stock-news' is specifically for stock-related news. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, making it easy for an agent to select the appropriate tool based on the query context.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with hyphens: 'general-search' and 'search-stock-news'. They use the same naming convention throughout, making the set predictable and readable without any deviations or mixed styles.
With only two tools, the server feels under-scoped for a 'Search Stock News MCP Server'. While the tools cover general and stock-specific searches, the domain suggests potential for more operations like filtering, sorting, or retrieving detailed news, making the count too low for the apparent purpose.
The tool surface is significantly incomplete for a stock news server. It lacks essential operations such as filtering news by date, source, or stock ticker, retrieving trending news, or accessing detailed article content. This will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform comprehensive stock news analysis.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Real-time financial news for AI agents: search by ticker and source, with sentiment and entities.
The only News based AI MCP your agents will ever need — custom categories, global regions, and time-scoped results in one tool. We use multi-vector & sparse-hybrid search to search through thousands of articles across the world to find the exact news you're looking for.
GNews MCP — Global news search via GNews API (gnews.io)
Get access to real-time and historical news data including top headlines from global sources
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server performs multi-topic searches in business, news, finance, and politics using the Tavily API, providing high-quality sources and intelligent summaries.1MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA remote MCP server that enables searching for news articles on specific topics through the Tavily API without requiring authentication.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server providing access to the GNews API for fetching news articles and headlines. Supports search and top headlines with advanced filtering by language, country, category, and date.1-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides live stock data and market news for financial analysis via any MCP-compatible AI app.2MIT