list-repos
Retrieve a list of all repositories within the Azure DevOps organization to quickly view and manage your code projects.
Instructions
List all repositories in the organization
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve a list of all repositories within the Azure DevOps organization to quickly view and manage your code projects.
List all repositories in the organization
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations, so description carries full burden. States it lists repos but doesn't mention pagination, returned fields, or any mutation behavior. Adequate for a simple list.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Efficient and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, could describe return format or pagination. Missing detail but adequate for a simple list tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, so description doesn't need to add param info. Schema coverage is 100% with empty properties, baseline score 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'list' and resource 'repositories' with scope 'all in the organization'. No confusion with siblings as they are different actions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or alternatives. Implied by lack of sibling with similar purpose, but no guidance on when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Cognitive-Stack/ares-devops-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server