Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to codivupload-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage social media accounts, upload media (videos and images), track upload status, and manage content across platforms like Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok via the XenonFlare API.
      10
      6 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to schedule and publish social media posts to platforms like Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, LinkedIn, Facebook, X, Threads, and Pinterest using natural language.
      33
      118 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents the ability to schedule and publish social media posts to Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X, LinkedIn, Facebook, Pinterest, Threads, and Bluesky. Create, schedule, and bulk-plan posts with per-platform captions, then check per-platform results and retry failures.
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Schedule and manage social media posts across 10 platforms (Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X, LinkedIn, YouTube, Threads, Pinterest, Bluesky, Telegram) from any MCP-compatible AI assistant. Supports batch posting, media uploads, analytics, and platform-specific features like Reels, Shorts, and carousels.
      11
      393 npm
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.4/5.0

    Scored across 30 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific resources like posts, webhooks, media, or integrations, but there is some overlap in naming patterns that could cause confusion. For example, 'createpost' and 'post_agency_media' both involve creation but target different resources, and the mix of 'create' and 'post' prefixes for similar actions might lead to misselection. However, descriptions generally clarify the target entities.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming is inconsistent with mixed conventions: some use verb_noun (e.g., 'createpost', 'deletewebhook'), others use noun_verb (e.g., 'get_agency_media'), and there are variations like 'post_agency_media' vs. 'createpost'. This lack of a predictable pattern makes the tool set harder to navigate and could confuse agents trying to infer functionality from names alone.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 30 tools, the count feels excessive for a media/content management server, suggesting potential bloat or fragmentation. While the domain might support many operations, the high number could overwhelm agents and indicate poor scoping, as some tools might be redundant or overly specific (e.g., multiple integration-specific list tools).

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a broad range of operations for media, posts, webhooks, and integrations, including CRUD actions for key resources like posts, media assets, and profiles. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit update or delete for some integration resources (e.g., Pinterest boards), but overall, it provides comprehensive coverage for content management workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues