Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to reforge-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that transforms Claude Code into an intelligent refactoring assistant, enabling code scanning, hotspot detection, optimization reports, and safe refactoring for large repositories.
      30 npm
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets Claude Code manage GitHub issues, branches, and pull requests through natural language, automating the full development workflow from planning to closing.
      523 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that lets Claude delegate scoped work to Codex with structured results and guardrails, supporting planning, code review, build, reverse engineering, and long-running background tasks.
      11
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects Gemini 2.5 Pro to Claude Code, enabling users to generate detailed implementation plans based on their codebase and receive feedback on code changes.
      5
      14
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct: read/write memory, apply diff, commit, and risk scoring have clear boundaries. Scanning-related tools (scan_repo, infer_architecture, get_health_score) overlap in inputs/outputs but serve different purposes, which descriptions clarify.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a uniform verb_noun_tool pattern (e.g., scan_repo_tool, write_fix_tool, read_memory_tool). The suffix is consistent and the verb-object structure is predictable, making it easy to guess tool behavior.

    Tool Count5/5

    The server has 10 tools, which is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool addresses a distinct need in the repository analysis and modification workflow, and none feel redundant or superfluous.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core lifecycle: scanning, analysis (architecture, risk, health), editing (diff apply), committing, memory persistence, and changelog generation. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit file listing or branch management, but these can be worked around using existing tools like get_chunk.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues