X402 MCP Template
Related Servers
Alternatives to X402 MCP Template
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for a live x402 payment gateway on Base (USDC). Lets AI agents discover, preview for free, then pay per call — with prepaid gasless payments, signed receipts, and delta delivery.7-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets your AI coding agent (Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Cursor, etc.) discover and pay on-chain agents registered on ERC-8004, using Coinbase's official x402 protocol. No smart account. No bundler. No relay. Just your EOA, an HTTPS request, and an automatic 402 → sign → retry flow.35MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProduction-grade Model Context Protocol (MCP) server delivering paywalled Web3 micro-services powered by autonomous x402 payment challenges on Base Mainnet.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for the x402 protocol that lets AI agents discover and call payment-gated HTTP APIs automatically.82 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server providing AI agents access to 38 pay-per-call APIs (LLM, image, code, audio, crypto, web, IPFS) via HTTP 402 micropayments in USDC/USDm.2253 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-ready template for building monetized MCP servers that require per-call payments via the Mainlayer infrastructure. It provides a structured payment gate that ensures AI agents pay for tool usage before accessing server logic or data.-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools have clearly distinct purposes: example_api_call is for making API calls, health_check is for service availability, and service_info is for retrieving service metadata. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool for each task.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures: example_api_call, health_check, and service_info. This uniformity enhances readability and predictability, making the tool set easy to navigate and understand.
With only three tools, the set feels thin for a server labeled as an 'MCP Template' that might imply broader functionality. While the tools cover basic API interaction, health, and info needs, the count is borderline low for a template that could be expanded, suggesting it might be under-scoped for more complex use cases.
The tools provide foundational coverage for API calls, health checks, and service information, but there are notable gaps. For a template server, missing operations like authentication, error handling, or specific endpoint management could limit agent workflows, indicating an incomplete surface for robust API integration.