p4_changelist_submit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose that submit is a mutation that commits changes to the depot, potentially causing conflicts or irreversible actions. It provides none of this, leaving the agent unaware of the tool's impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is under-specified to the point of being nearly tautological. It is short but does not earn its place, as it fails to convey any operational detail beyond the tool's name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a submission tool with no annotations and no output schema, this description is severely incomplete. It lacks prerequisites, side effects, and error context, making it difficult for an agent to use safely even with full schema coverage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already fully documents each parameter. The description adds no extra parameter semantics, making the baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Submit a changelist' uses a specific verb (submit) and resource (changelist), which clearly states what the tool does. It distinguishes from sibling tools like p4_changelist_create and p4_move_to_changelist, though it assumes familiarity with Perforce terminology.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as requiring a pending changelist or comparing to p4_changelist_create. The intended use is only implied by the verb 'submit'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.