Skip to main content
Glama

Take ownership of pipeline schedule

take_ownership_pipeline_schedule

Assign ownership of a GitLab pipeline schedule to the current user.

Instructions

Make the current GitLab user the owner of a pipeline schedule.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectYesGitLab project ID or full path such as group/project.
pipeline_schedule_idYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYesGitLab response normalized for model use.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not disclose side effects, permissions required, or consequences of ownership transfer. Annotations provide some hints but the description adds no behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a concise single sentence that directly conveys the purpose without unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple ownership-transfer action, the description covers the core function. It does not specify return values or error conditions, but given the tool's simplicity and lack of output schema, it is reasonably complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

One of two parameters (project) has a description, covering 50% of the schema. The other parameter (pipeline_schedule_id) lacks description, and the tool description does not elaborate on either parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: making the current user the owner of a pipeline schedule. It is specific and distinct from sibling tools that manage other aspects of pipeline schedules.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool, prerequisites, or alternatives. It simply states the action without context on when it should be invoked.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CobolJunkie/gitlab-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server