Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to wallcheck

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to scan a public URL in passive or authorized mode and receive only bounded, sanitized structured findings (severity, confidence, standard, evidence, remediation) with quarantined evidence instead of raw page dumps. A second tool lets agents inspect the scanner's safety boundaries and coverage without making any network request.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to run scope-checked probes of MCP endpoints, analyze tool definitions for poisoning and dangerous capabilities, detect definition drift, and generate reproducible evidence bundles and bounty-ready reports.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only collection and comparison of Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster data, conservative URL protection, content auditing, reviewed-build verification, and private report generation through ten typed tools over stdio.
      10
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes read-only local analysis tools for source auditing, web traffic review, binary reverse engineering, exploit scaffolding, OSINT, and reporting via JSON-RPC over stdio, enabling LLMs to orchestrate evidence-based security workflows without executing targets or sending network requests.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run passive, boundary, and gated active reconnaissance and web-security CLI tools (nmap, sqlmap, commix, httpx, ffuf, nikto, subfinder, and more) against authorized targets through a persistent, API-key-protected HTTP service. Scope gates, authorization windows, evidence capture, and a full audit trail are enforced in code so every tool call stays within the engagement's declared rules.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    probe_url and scan_exposure both perform a single honest GET and classify the wall, so their boundary is fuzzy; the scan_exposure description does clarify it adds secret-scanning, which helps, but an agent wanting wall classification alone has two plausible choices. audit is clearly domain-level and classify is clearly offline, so those two are distinct.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Two names are bare verbs (audit, classify) and two use verb_noun (probe_url, scan_exposure), so there is no single predictable pattern. All are snake_case and readable, but the convention is mixed.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a sensible, tightly scoped surface for a read-only agent-access wall checker. The only redundancy is that scan_exposure subsumes probe_url, so one tool is arguably not earning a fully independent place.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers domain-level audit, single-URL probing, secret/exposure scanning, and offline classification of captured responses, which is good lifecycle coverage for a diagnostic tool. Minor gap: no batch or multi-URL operation despite the probes being read-only and cheap, forcing repeated single calls.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessOutdated data