Skip to main content
Glama
Cloto-dev

CPersona

Official
by Cloto-dev

persistence_status

Read-only

Check if persistence is paused and the remaining TTL in seconds for your session or shared bucket, so you know when memory writes resume.

Instructions

Report whether persistence is currently paused and the TTL remaining (in seconds). It reports the bucket session_key selects (response scope), not the server as a whole: with a session_key it answers for your session only, so paused: false here does not mean no other session is paused. Without one it reflects the bucket every keyless caller shares, which on a streamable-HTTP deployment means paused: true may have been armed by a different keyless session.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
session_keyNoOpaque session identity you declare: a partition hint, not authentication and not a data filter. Selects which no-persist pause applies to this call. Omit to share one bucket with every caller that omits it. Full text on recall.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv2.6.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / session_key / maxLength
      Added value: +256
  2. Changed1 schema field changedv2.5.10
    • addedInput schema / properties / session_key
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "description": "Opaque session identity you declare: a partition hint, not authentication and not a data filter. Selects which no-persist pause applies to this call. Omit to share one bucket with every caller that omits it. Full text on recall.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Addedv2.4.34

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. Beyond that, the description adds valuable behavioral context: what the `scope` response reflects, and the non-obvious caveat that `paused: false` for your session does not imply no other session is paused, including the keyless-HTTP scenario.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the core purpose in the first sentence, then spends the remaining text on the genuinely useful scoping caveats. It is dense but every sentence carries weight; no filler or repetition of the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description correctly enumerates what is returned (paused flag, TTL, scope). For a single-parameter read tool with nuanced scoping, the description supplies everything an agent needs to interpret the result correctly, including the keyless-bucket edge case.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the schema already documents session_key in depth (opaque partition hint, default, maxLength). The description reinforces which bucket it selects but adds no syntax or format detail beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (report) and resource (persistence paused state) plus the returned value (TTL in seconds). It also distinguishes itself from the broader system by clarifying it reports the session-scoped bucket rather than the server as a whole.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description thoroughly explains the two usage modes (with vs. without session_key) and their differing semantics, which is genuine guidance. However, it never names the natural alternatives (pause_persistence, resume_persistence) or states explicitly when to call this tool versus them, leaving routing to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.