ClockNext MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to ClockNext MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceConnects AI agents to Revenium for cost tracking, alerting, and usage-based billing, enabling AI assistants to manage costs, set alerts, and handle billing operations.7158 PyPIMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables creating, sending, and tracking invoices from MCP clients like Claude, Cursor, or Windsurf, using a hosted endpoint with API token.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceReal-time Claude.ai subscription awareness for AI coding assistants. Surfaces live utilization, forecasts limits, gates expensive operations, and measures real per-task cost.517 npm6MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables time tracking and invoicing through natural conversation with MCP clients like Claude or ChatGPT, allowing users to log work hours, query unbilled time, and draft invoices, with a minimal web app for settings, CSV import, and Stripe-powered billing.-

Subotiz MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage subscriptions, usage-based billing, payments, refunds, tax compliance, and invoicing to drive revenue growth.1MIT- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables access to Usage and Billing APIs for managing accounts, products, meters, plans, and usage reporting. Supports operations like creating products/plans, reporting usage, and retrieving billing information.18MIT
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
Every tool targets a distinct resource and action: CRUD per entity plus usage verification/recording and docs helpers. The verify vs record usage pair is clearly separated as dry-run vs billed, and all list/get/create/update/archive tools are unambiguous for their entity.
All tools follow a consistent clocknext_verb_noun pattern in snake_case (list_models, create_credit, archive_unit, etc.). Even compound names like bulk_import_customers and whoami fit the general style without mixing conventions.
35 tools is well above the 25+ threshold for 'too many', even though the billing domain has many entity types. The number feels heavy and could be trimmed or split into focused sub-servers, especially given several entities have near-identical CRUD patterns.
Significant lifecycle gaps exist: customers have no update/archive/delete, purchases have only create (no list/get/update/cancel), and there are no tools for invoices or wallet transactions. The core setup and usage recording flows work, but managing subscriptions and customers over time is incomplete.