list_routes
Retrieve a list of routes from Wahoo Cloud API, filtered by external ID if provided.
Instructions
List routes from Wahoo Cloud API
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| external_id | No | Filter routes by external ID |
Retrieve a list of routes from Wahoo Cloud API, filtered by external ID if provided.
List routes from Wahoo Cloud API
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| external_id | No | Filter routes by external ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It fails to disclose important behaviors such as authentication requirements, pagination, or read-only nature.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single concise sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it could be more informative without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (list with one optional filter), the description is adequate but lacks return value information and behavioral context, which would be important given no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and includes a parameter description. The tool description adds no new meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states 'List routes' with source, clearly identifying the resource and action. It distinguishes from sibling tools like list_workouts by referencing a different resource type.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With siblings present, it would be beneficial to recommend this over list_workouts for routes.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ClemensHar/wahoo-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server