Skip to main content
Glama
Citedrelevance

BreachSpider MCP server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to BreachSpider MCP server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search, correlate, and monitor real-time vulnerability intelligence from NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS, and MITRE ATT&CK, including CVE details, critical CVE tracking, known exploited vulnerabilities, and exploitation probability scores.
      5
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to access realtime CVE intelligence aggregated from NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS, GitHub advisories, PoC discovery, and Metasploit/Nuclei tooling, providing vulnerability details, exploitation signals, and prioritized triage verdicts.
      12
      7 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides CVE lookup, search, and exploit intelligence from public vulnerability sources (NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS) for AI agents to produce remediation guidance without consuming LLM tokens for data fetching.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides live CVE data from NVD and EPSS without API key, enabling AI assistants to look up CVSS scores, search vulnerabilities, and check product CVEs.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to inventory the Windows software installed on a machine and match it against current CVE sources (cvelistV5, CISA KEV, EPSS, NVD), turning the hits into a persistent to-do list prioritized by exploitation and severity. It also produces an AI effort assessment for each entry, either by sampling the client or by returning an evidence package the client writes back.
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a fairly distinct purpose: correlate_devices (device-to-CVE mapping), check_changes (cheap re-check via result_hash), lookup_cve (single CVE by id), and get_fix_plan (per-device remediation). The one soft overlap is that correlate_devices already returns a fix plan in its output while get_fix_plan offers a dedicated per-device plan, which could cause an agent to hesitate; descriptions mostly resolve this.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern: correlate_devices, check_changes, lookup_cve, get_fix_plan. The convention is uniform throughout with no mixed styles or casing.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is lean but appropriate for a focused device-vulnerability correlation service, and each earns its place (correlate, re-check, CVE lookup, fix plan). It is on the thin side, with no room for batch or search operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: correlate devices, cheaply detect changes, look up individual CVEs, and get a fix plan. Minor gaps exist—no cross-cutting CVE search (by keyword/severity) or a tool to enumerate inventory—but the primary workflows are complete and the result_hash linkage is a thoughtful touch.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues