bc.list
List Biomedical Concepts from the CDISC Library, optionally filtered by category.
Instructions
List latest Biomedical Concepts (optional category).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | No |
List Biomedical Concepts from the CDISC Library, optionally filtered by category.
List latest Biomedical Concepts (optional category).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description mentions 'latest' but no details on ordering, pagination, limits, or effect of missing category. Minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, no wasted words. However, it may be too brief, sacrificing completeness for conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description should provide more context (e.g., return format, pagination, meaning of 'latest'). Currently inadequate for a list tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, but description adds minimal value: indicates category is optional. No details on valid values, format, or behavior when omitted.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (list) and resource (Biomedical Concepts) with an optional filter (category). It distinguishes from siblings like bc.get and bc.categories implicitly, though not explicitly.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings (e.g., bc.get for a specific concept, bc.categories for category list). The description only states what it does, not context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Cicatriiz/cdisc-library-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server