Skip to main content
Glama
Choppaaahh

sendgrid-mcp-secure

Related Servers

Alternatives to sendgrid-mcp-secure

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that sends mail over SMTP, gated behind an allowlist and a human confirmation
      4
      46 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server providing read and send access to a single IMAP/SMTP mailbox over Streamable HTTP with GitHub OAuth authentication, featuring recipient allowlists for security, email reading/searching/threading, attachments, drafts, folder management, and sending/reply tools.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI applications to send text, HTML, and template-based emails using SendGrid. It supports file attachments, CC/BCC recipients, and easy deployment via Python or Docker.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables Claude Code agents to send and read emails via SMTP/IMAP with per-agent credential isolation and audit logging.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables LLMs to POST, GET, and DELETE cron jobs that schedule email sends via SendGrid.
      4
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gmail MCP server — scope-gated tools (readonly / send / modify), path jails for attachments + downloads, hardened OAuth credentials, Sigstore-signed releases.
      133 npm
      12
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: preview vs send, add vs remove suppression, list vs get template, list vs check suppression. Even the two-step email flow is clearly separated by intent and confirm token. No overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow verb_noun (preview_email, add_suppression, list_templates, check_suppression) with consistent use of list/get for collections vs single items. 'server_status' is the only deviation, using noun_noun instead of a verb.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool covers a meaningful part of email sending, suppression management, templates, stats, and domain auth. The count feels intentional and scoped, not padded or sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers the core workflows: preview-and-send, suppression management (add/remove/list/check), template inspection, stats, and domain auth. Minor gaps exist (no template creation/update/delete, no per-template stats), but they don't block the primary use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues