Interline
Related Servers
Alternatives to Interline
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to autonomously make policy-controlled payments for APIs and tools via Bitcoin Lightning (L402) and Base USDC (x402), including paying paywalled endpoints, checking balances, and reviewing transactions.37 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover, pay for, and sell HTTP APIs using the x402 micropayment protocol, with USDC settlement on Base mainnet. Includes tools for payment requirements, paying and fetching resources, building seller configurations, and monitoring revenue.82 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to call x402-gated APIs using a central credit balance, abstracting away blockchain complexity and payment proofs. It provides tools to fetch data from payment-required endpoints, check usage balances, and simulate transaction costs.636 npm2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover and pay for x402-enabled services using natural language, with multi-chain support for Solana and EVM payments.5 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover and pay for x402-gated HTTP APIs, handling 402 Payment Required flows with local signing. Supports EVM and Solana with non-custodial wallet management.2253 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to call 45 micro-priced utility tools via x402 micropayments on Base, covering search, screenshots, OCR, PDFs, WHOIS, geo-IP, and more without API keys.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: discovering endpoint-specific rails, listing all known rails, paying for a resource, and viewing payment history. No overlap or ambiguity.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (discover_, list_, pay_), but 'payment_history' is a noun_noun pair, creating a minor inconsistency. Overall clear and predictable.
Four tools cover the essential operations for a payment rail server: discovery, listing, payment, and history. The count is well-scoped and appropriate.
Core workflows are covered: rail discovery (per-endpoint and global), payment, and history. Missing potential operations like refund or cancellation, but not critical for the stated purpose.