Weather MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| get_alertsA | Get weather alerts for a US state. Args: state: Two-letter US state code (e.g. CA, NY) |
| get_forecastC | Get weather forecast for a location. Args: latitude: Latitude of the location longitude: Longitude of the location |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools serve entirely different purposes: one for alerts by state, another for forecast by coordinates. No overlap or confusion possible.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_alerts, get_forecast), making it easy to predict naming.
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin compared to typical weather API capabilities. It's borderline but not excessive given its narrow scope.
The server lacks common weather operations like current conditions, hourly forecast, or historical data. Significant gaps exist for a comprehensive weather service.