Skip to main content
Glama

UpdateServiceBinding

Update the publication state of an ABAP service binding to published, unpublished, or unchanged via ADT workflow.

Instructions

Update publication state for ABAP service binding via AdtServiceBinding workflow.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
service_nameYesPublished service name.
service_typeNoOData service type for publish/unpublish action routing.ODataV4
response_formatNoxml
service_versionNoPublished service version. Optional.
service_binding_nameYesService binding name to update.
desired_publication_stateYesTarget publication state.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only mentions 'update publication state' and 'via AdtServiceBinding workflow,' but lacks details on side effects, permissions required, or reversibility. The workflow reference is vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It is concise but could benefit from slightly more detail without compromising brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks important context such as return values (no output schema), error conditions, and detailed workflow steps. Given the tool has 6 parameters and no output schema, the description is insufficient for full understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema coverage is high (83%), with descriptions for most parameters. However, some descriptions are poor (e.g., response_format description is just 'xml'). The tool description adds minimal parameter context beyond the schema, such as the workflow reference. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it updates the publication state of an ABAP service binding. The verb 'Update' and resource 'publication state' are specific, and it is distinct from Create, Delete, Get, and Validate siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ValidateServiceBinding or other update tools. The description does not specify prerequisites or conditions for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ChinhHN-DEV/abap-mcp-adt'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server