Skip to main content
Glama
Ching-Chiang

comsol-mcp

by Ching-Chiang
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to comsol-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • comsol-codex-mcp

      XiaoSe532
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides tools for reproducible COMSOL Multiphysics batch workflows, enabling AI agents to compile, run, and diagnose Java API model scripts with COMSOL.
      4
      MIT

    • SolidworksMCP

      czuryk
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling a live SOLIDWORKS session through the Windows COM API, enabling native CAD operations like sketches, features, bodies, views, and exports, plus transactional plans and vectorization.
      6
      MIT

    • comsol-mcp-server

      Qwup2112
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate COMSOL Multiphysics simulations, including model management, geometry building, physics configuration, meshing, solving, and results visualization via the MCP protocol.
      MIT

    • COMSOL MCP Server

      HBPEKING-TKS
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate COMSOL Multiphysics simulations, including model management, geometry building, physics configuration, meshing, solving, and results visualization through the MCP protocol.
      78
      MIT

    • Ansys Workbench MCP

      Chen-Xin-Yuan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients like Codex to control Ansys Workbench and ICEM CFD locally, executing scripts, managing projects, and running simulations.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct action or entity: server management, model operations, geometry/mesh features, parameters, and study execution. There is no ambiguity between server tools, model tools, and feature tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names mix two patterns: noun_verb (e.g., server_connect, model_create) and verb_noun (e.g., create_feature, set_parameters). While still readable, the inconsistency across the set reduces predictability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 18 tools, the set covers server lifecycle, model CRUD, geometry/mesh operations, parameters, and study runs without being bloated or insufficient for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover core workflows: server management, model creation/loading/saving, parameter manipulation, feature creation/deletion/update, and running sequences/studies. Missing result extraction and mesh-specific feature creation are minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources