ezmcd-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ezmcd-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA PRD-first multi-agent MCP server that wraps agent definitions, collaboration rules, and staged delivery into a local stdio service for standardized software delivery workflows.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides a sovereign, MIT-licensed MCP server for professional-service workflows, running entirely on your infrastructure with Ed25519 cryptographic signing for every action.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local stdio MCP server that brings scattered tickets, transactions, and current policies together so a model can retrieve evidence, assess cases, and prepare reply and escalation drafts. All writes stay local and pending human review, with no ability to send messages, move money, change accounts, or publish content.7Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA persistent AI partner MCP server that keeps identity, memory, goals and refusals in a local SQLite substrate, renting language work from Claude, ChatGPT, Kimi, local models or any BYOK OpenAI-compatible provider, with governed shell/fs/http tools, MCP "hands" gated by state-transition-validated cognition, loopback-only security, and tamper-evident audit.10AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA sovereign, MIT-licensed MCP server for professional-service workflows, providing offline-capable, Ed25519-signed tools for autonomous agents and human developers.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server for agents that need to work across multiple Gmail and Microsoft 365 accounts without cloud token storage.6-
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools target clearly distinct resources or actions, and the descriptions explicitly clarify boundaries around account, cart, and checkout. The closest overlap is between order_pay and checkout_submit because both involve real payment, but the existing-order versus fresh-quote distinction is stated.
All names use snake_case and are mostly resource_action, but the pattern is mixed: accounts_list and stores_favorites use plural resources while account_check and store_get use singular, and several names are noun_noun (order_status, product_detail). The conventions are readable but not fully consistent.
17 tools is slightly above the typical 3–15 range, but the domain has several separate stages—account, store/menu, cart, checkout, payment/status—so each tool is largely justified. It is on the heavy side but not excessive for a safety-critical ordering workflow.
The core purchase flow is covered from account check through menu, cart, quote, payment, and status. However, cart editing is limited to add-only operations with no remove/update/clear, and there are no tools for order cancellation, order history, or store search/favorites management.