Skip to main content
Glama
ChesterRa

命盘 Mingpan

by ChesterRa

紫微流年列表

ziwei_liunian

Calculate Zi Wei Dou Shu annual fortune trends across a year range, returning each year's Gregorian and Ganzhi year, virtual age, annual palace, main stars, decadal, and four transformations.

Instructions

紫微流年列表。

返回指定年份範圍內的流年信息:

  • 公曆年份

  • 干支年

  • 虛歲

  • 流年宮位

  • 宮內主星

  • 所屬大限

  • 流年四化

用於分析多年運勢趨勢。

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dayYes日 1-31
hourYes時 0-23
nameNo命主姓名(可選)
yearYes公曆年 1900-2100
monthYes月 1-12
genderYes性別(影響大運順逆)
minuteNo分 0-59,默認 0
endYearYesEnd year for the range
isLunarNo輸入日期是否為農曆,默認公曆
timezoneNoIANA 時區名(如 America/New_York)。默認北京時間;設置後輸入時間按此時區換算為北京時間排盤。農曆輸入時忽略
longitudeNo出生地經度(真太陽時校正,可選)
startYearYesStart year for the range

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed12 schema fields changedv0.1.8
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • changedInput schema / properties / day / description
      Previous value: -"Birth day (1-31)"New value: +"日 1-31"
    • changedInput schema / properties / gender / description
      Previous value: -"Gender for fortune direction calculation"New value: +"性別(影響大運順逆)"
    • changedInput schema / properties / hour / description
      Previous value: -"Birth hour in 24-hour format (0-23)"New value: +"時 0-23"
    • changedInput schema / properties / isLunar / description
      Previous value: -"Whether the input date is in lunar calendar (農曆). If true, will be converted to solar calendar internally."New value: +"輸入日期是否為農曆,默認公曆"
    • changedInput schema / properties / longitude / description
      Previous value: -"Birth location longitude for true solar time adjustment"New value: +"出生地經度(真太陽時校正,可選)"
    • changedInput schema / properties / minute / description
      Previous value: -"Birth minute (0-59)"New value: +"分 0-59,默認 0"
    • changedInput schema / properties / month / description
      Previous value: -"Birth month (1-12)"New value: +"月 1-12"
    • changedInput schema / properties / name / description
      Previous value: -"Subject name (optional)"New value: +"命主姓名(可選)"
    • addedInput schema / properties / timezone
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "IANA 時區名(如 America/New_York)。默認北京時間;設置後輸入時間按此時區換算為北京時間排盤。農曆輸入時忽略",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / year / description
      Previous value: -"Birth year (e.g., 1990)"New value: +"公曆年 1900-2100"
  2. First observedv0.1.3

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry behavioral disclosure. It implies a read-only list/return operation and lists the output fields, but it does not state permissions, side effects, or determinism. With no annotations, this is only partially complete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, with the return fields presented as a scannable list. Each part—purpose, output fields, and usage note—earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 12 parameters, 100% schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema, the description helpfully lists the returned fields and usage context. It still omits behavioral guarantees and sibling routing, but is reasonably complete for invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the description adds no parameter-level detail beyond the schema. The schema already documents all 12 inputs, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it returns 流年 information across a specified year range and enumerates the returned fields (公曆年份, 干支年, 虛歲, etc.). This clearly identifies the annual-scope ziwei tool, though it does not explicitly name sibling alternatives such as ziwei_liuyue or ziwei_liuri.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It says it is used for analyzing multi-year fortune trends (用於分析多年運勢趨勢), giving clear context for when to use it. However, it does not state when not to use it or name alternative sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.