Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Jupyter MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI to connect and manage Jupyter Notebooks in real-time, with support for cell operations, execution, and multimodal outputs.
      BSD 3-Clause
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects directly to a Jupyter kernel via ZMQ, enabling AI assistants to read, create, edit, execute, and manage Jupyter Notebooks as MCP tools.
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Control Protocol (MCP) server that enables remote programmatic control of Jupyter notebooks, allowing AI assistants and applications to create, edit, and execute notebook cells via SSE protocol.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to create, read, edit, and manage Jupyter Notebook files programmatically, overcoming limitations in Cursor's native notebook support.
      163 PyPI
      161
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. For example, append_execute_code_cell versus execute_cell differ in that one creates a new cell before executing, while execute_cell runs an existing one. execute_temporary_code is separate for temporary code. All other tools operate on different aspects (connect, list, read, write, delete, etc.), leaving no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, such as connect_notebook, list_cell, overwrite_cell, restart_notebook. The compound verb in append_execute_code_cell is still systematic and matches the pattern.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the set is well-scoped for a Jupyter notebook interaction server. Each tool serves a distinct operation (connect, list, read, write, execute, etc.) without unnecessary duplication or excessive granularity.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover core workflows: connecting, listing, reading, executing, inserting, deleting, overwriting cells, and restarting kernels. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit save tool or ability to create a new notebook, but these are non-critical for typical agent interactions.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues