Skip to main content
Glama
ChenReuven

MCP TypeScript Simple Template

by ChenReuven

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP TypeScript Simple Template

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A foundation for building custom local Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that provide tools accessible to AI assistants like Cursor or Claude Desktop.
      1
      37
      MIT
    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A standardized foundation for building Model Context Protocol servers that integrate with VS Code, using Python with stdio transport for seamless AI tool integration.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A streamlined foundation for building Model Context Protocol servers in Python, designed to make AI-assisted development of MCP tools easier and more efficient.
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal, production-ready MCP server with a simple addition calculator tool that demonstrates integration with the Model Context Protocol.
      3 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.5/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: calculate_bmi is for health-related calculations, while echo is for text repetition. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, making it easy for an agent to choose the right tool.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The naming is inconsistent: calculate_bmi uses kebab-case, while echo uses lowercase without a clear pattern. There is no consistent verb_noun convention, and the styles are mixed, though the names are still readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels too thin for a general-purpose template. It lacks depth and variety, suggesting an incomplete or minimal implementation that doesn't fully cover a meaningful domain.

    Completeness1/5

    The server is severely incomplete; it only offers two unrelated tools with no descriptions, making it impossible to assess domain coverage. There are obvious gaps, and it doesn't support any coherent workflow or lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues