Skip to main content
Glama
ChangooLee

MCP OpenDART

by ChangooLee

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP OpenDART

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access Korea's DART financial data system for retrieving and analyzing corporate disclosures and financial information through natural language queries.
      435 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with real-time access to Korean listed companies' disclosures, financial statements, and corporate information via the DART API.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access Korean corporate disclosure data from DART, allowing natural language queries about companies, financial statements, and disclosures.
      45 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query Korean listed companies' financial statements, public disclosures, executive information, and shareholder structures in real-time using the DART API.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search and analyze OpenDART electronic disclosures, including filings, financial statements, XBRL, ownership, insider signals, accounting-risk scores, and Buffett-style quality checks. It also converts HWP/PDF attachments into Markdown for direct reading and summarization.
      1,087 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query Korea's OpenDART disclosure system, covering filings, financials, ownership, and XBRL with Buffett-style quality checklists, insider signals, and accounting risk scoring, plus conversion of HWP/PDF attachments into markdown for direct analysis.
      1,087 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 85 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific financial events or corporate actions, such as get_bankruptcy for liquidity crises or get_merger for mergers. However, some tools like get_debt and get_debt_securities_issued have overlapping themes around debt issuance, which could cause minor confusion. The detailed descriptions help clarify, but the sheer number of tools increases the risk of misselection in closely related areas.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case naming pattern with a 'get_' prefix, except for search_financial_notes which uses 'search_' but maintains the same style. This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate, with no deviations in verb usage or formatting that would hinder agent interpretation.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 85 tools, the count is excessive for a single server, likely overwhelming for agents and leading to inefficiency. While the domain of corporate financial disclosures is broad, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., multiple tools for executive compensation or treasury stock). This heavy toolset feels bloated and difficult to manage effectively.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for corporate financial disclosures and risk analysis, including tools for data retrieval (e.g., get_corporation_code), financial events (e.g., get_bankruptcy), governance (e.g., get_executive_info), and analysis (e.g., get_single_index). There are no obvious gaps; agents can access everything from basic company info to detailed financial notes and risk assessments.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues